Beyond ‘deliverism’
The widespread assumption among progressives that the way to win robust support is simply to deliver economic improvements in people’s lives – an assumption reminiscent of commodity fetishism – is fatally flawed. It’s not that economic improvements aren’t important, it’s just that people need something more:
Solving the authoritarianism challenge requires a progressive program and organizing strategy that speak directly and persuasively to the wave of unhappiness and despair and are rooted in the texture of everyday life—what people actually talk about, care about, and worry about. Such an approach will continue to foreground economic security and rights, but it must also affirm other aspects of human flourishing that have long been emphasized by diverse social movements, including the importance of collective care, community, belonging, and solidarity. The task for progressives at this historical juncture is not to find the magic message or to deliver more popular policies. Rather, it is to offer a compelling, energizing, persuasive vision of the good life and to organize mass-based organizations through which people shape and live out those values in the here and now. Read more here.
Recent Posts
Popular Tags
animation
annie leonard
arms dealers
austerity
banks
climate change
corporate welfare
corruption
debt
democracy
Econ4 video remix contest
economics
education
employment
energy
environment
financial crisis
fiscal policy
free-market
gar alperovitz
gerald friedman
greed
green
growth
health care
inequality
insurance
investment
james k. boyce
john maynard keynes
joseph stiglitz
Juliet Schor
labor
markets
minimum wage
movements
music
new economy
Occupy Wall Street
politics
recession
regulation
robert reich
subsidies
taxes