Common wealth dividends
Peter Barnes explains how protecting the environment and sharing the fruits of our economy more broadly can – and should – go hand-in-hand:
The failure to charge for common wealth — for example, letting polluters dump freely into our atmosphere — leads to what economists call “negative externalities.” The costs of pollution aren’t paid by polluters; they are shifted to pollutees, nature and future generations. And this market failure persists because no living individuals or companies would financially benefit from fixing it.But imagine a system in which everyone benefits from fixing this tragic flaw. In this system, polluters would pay and all living citizens, as joint beneficiaries and trustees of nature’s gifts, would get dividends. The higher the price for using the commons, the larger the dividends and the lower the externalities. The health of nature’s gifts would be directly linked to greater income for everyone.
Read more here.
Recent Posts
Popular Tags
animation
annie leonard
arms dealers
austerity
banks
climate change
corporate welfare
corruption
debt
democracy
Econ4 video remix contest
economics
education
employment
energy
environment
financial crisis
fiscal policy
free-market
gar alperovitz
gerald friedman
greed
green
growth
health care
inequality
insurance
investment
james k. boyce
john maynard keynes
joseph stiglitz
Juliet Schor
labor
markets
minimum wage
movements
music
new economy
Occupy Wall Street
politics
recession
regulation
robert reich
subsidies
taxes