Labor markets: why “flexibility” is not all it’s cracked up to be
For years lamestream economics has touted “labor market flexibility” – a euphemism for making it easier for employers to dismiss workers – as the best recipe for job creation. Guess what? It turns out that countries whose policies make labor markets more supportive for workers – including better wages, better benefits and better job security – are doing better at job creation. The evidence prompts a New York Times reporter to ask:
What if the very thing that is often viewed as one of the United States’ sources of dynamism — flexible labor markets — is the driving force behind the economy’s greatest weakness: millions of people who are neither working nor looking for a job?
Read more here.
Recent Posts
Popular Tags
animation
annie leonard
arms dealers
austerity
banks
climate change
corporate welfare
corruption
debt
democracy
Econ4 video remix contest
economics
education
employment
energy
environment
financial crisis
fiscal policy
free-market
gar alperovitz
gerald friedman
greed
green
growth
health care
inequality
insurance
investment
james k. boyce
john maynard keynes
joseph stiglitz
Juliet Schor
labor
markets
minimum wage
movements
music
new economy
Occupy Wall Street
politics
recession
regulation
robert reich
subsidies
taxes